AccessLumens

An element uses a role it isn't allowed to have

Minoraria-allowed-roleBest practice, not a WCAG failure

23.6%

of the 609 sites we scanned fail this

Ranging from 13.1% of Indian financial services to 30.7% of Shopify DTC stores. Pooled across five targeted cohorts, so treat it as a convenience sample rather than a rate for the web.

What it means and how to fix it

When an element claims a role it can't legitimately have — like a video marked as pure decoration — assistive technologies may announce it incorrectly or hide content users actually need, while the element can still be seen and even focused.

The fix. Remove the disallowed role or replace it with one the element supports; if the element really is decorative, also hide it from assistive technology and keep it out of the tab order.

How often it fails

Shopify DTC stores23/75
30.7%
US healthcare providers56/208
26.9%
US local government36/158
22.8%
EU e-commerce21/107
19.6%
Indian financial services8/61
13.1%

Share of scanned sites in each cohort. These are five targeted studies, not a random sample of the web, so read the contrast between cohorts rather than any one figure as a web-wide rate.

Who fails it most3 cuts by retail vertical, sector, country

By retail vertical

food7/14
50%
fitness6/14
42.9%
home5/16
31.3%
apparel4/18
22.2%
beauty1/13
7.7%

By sector

Retail / Marketplace6/12
50%
Telecom6/21
28.6%
Grocery3/12
25%
Travel / Ticketing3/14
21.4%
Fashion1/8
12.5%
Banking2/19
10.5%

By country

Netherlands5/15
33.3%
France4/12
33.3%
Ireland3/12
25%
Italy3/12
25%
Germany4/19
21.1%
Spain1/11
9.1%
Sweden1/15
6.7%
Poland0/11
0%

Groups smaller than 8 sites are not shown: a rate over a handful of sites moves by tens of points on a single result.

What this does not measureLimits of these figures, and where the corpus came from
  • This rule maps to no success criterion, so a site failing it is not failing WCAG. It is still worth fixing: these are the patterns that decide whether assistive technology can navigate a page efficiently rather than merely read it.
  • These are five targeted cohorts, not a random sample of the web. Per-cohort rates are the figure to quote; the pooled rate is a convenience sample.
  • Denominators count sites that produced a result. Sites that were blocked or errored are excluded rather than counted as passing.
  • Occurrence counts are floors: the engine records at most 25 occurrences of a rule per page.
  • The EU and Indian cohorts retained only the primary success criterion per finding, so a rule mapping to several criteria contributes to one of them in those two cohorts and to all of them in the other three.
Cohorts in the corpus, with sites scanned and attempted
CohortScannedAttempted
Shopify DTC stores7575
US local government158221
US healthcare providers208218
EU e-commerce107170
Indian financial services6172

Corpus generated 2026-09-18.

Check your own site

A free scan reports this check alongside everything else, with the exact elements that fail.

Run a free scan

All accessibility rules and WCAG criteria