Aurora, CO accessibility score
auroragov.org · Automated scan, 5 July 2026
Score
From an automated scan of public pages. Higher is better.
93out of 100
Few automated issues found
Issues found, by severity
- 1Critical
- 3Serious
- 4Moderate
- 3Minor
How it compares
US city governments median: 94. 66 of the 158 sites we scanned in this group have at least one critical barrier (42%).
auroragov.org scored 1 point below the median.
Top issues found
Most severe first. Occurrences are counted across the pages scanned.
- Form elements must have labelsCriticalWCAG 4.1.2 · 1 occurrence
- <li> elements must be contained in a <ul> or <ol>SeriousWCAG 1.3.1 · 7 occurrences
- <ul> and <ol> must only directly contain <li>, <script> or <template> elementsSeriousWCAG 1.3.1 · 3 occurrences
- ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible nameSeriousBest practice · 2 occurrences
- All page content should be contained by landmarksModerateBest practice · 45 occurrences
Next steps
This is an automated scan of public pages on auroragov.org on 5 July 2026. It is not a full review and not a legal determination of conformance with any standard or law. Automated tools detect only part of WCAG failures; many need a person to assess. See our methodology and disclaimer.